
| Home | Purpose | Editors | Board of Reviewers | Author Guidelines | Review Process | Issues |
Martin,
D. B. (2000). Mathematics success and failure among African-American
youth: The roles of sociohistorical context, community forces,
school influence, and individual agency. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (ISBN 0-8058-3042-1, 214 pages) Bruce B. Douglas, M.S. Danny Martin
introduces his book on the mathematical success and failure of African
American youth with a preface in which he discusses his reasons for
writing the book. The text was both a personal and professional project
for the author and is the result of his efforts to understand
mathematical success and failure among African-American youth. The
author suggests that this book is also about history and context. It is
about history because the mathematical experiences of the African
American parents and community members profiled in the book can not be
discussed apart from their larger socioeconomic and educational
experiences or the treatment they receive over the course of their lives
as a result of their African-American status. This book is about context
because the mathematical experiences of African American parents and
students are subject to a variety of interrelated contextual influences.
The author also hints that these contextual influences included the
sociohistorical, community, family, school, and intrapersonal forces
that have an impact on their academic and mathematical development at
both the individual and group level. The purpose of this
text is to address the psychological, academic, and mathematical
development of African American adolescents, viewed in the context of
the various forces that significantly impact their academic achievement.
In this book, Martin acknowledges that numerous studies on mathematics
achievement and persistence among African Americans rely on the analysis
and presentation of aggregated test-taking data, with limited attention
or voice given to the individuals in these studies. Because prior
studies have failed to link contextual forces in meaningful or complex
ways, the author’s analysis suggests that these studies can be
characterized by both theoretical and methodological
limitations—restrictions that hinder the ability of mathematics
educators to reverse the negative achievement and persistence trends
that continue to affect African-American students. Therefore, it is the
sincere hope of the author that this book will contribute to a greater
understanding of the mathematical education of African American
students, and ultimately, to increase success in mathematics for all
students. At the very
beginning, Martin opens the book by describing how his experiences as a
student and teacher of mathematics led him to investigate mathematics
success and failure among African American youth. As a teacher and
researcher, the author struggled with the questions of why African
Americans remain underrepresented in mathematics and why large numbers
of these students achieve below their academic potential. In search of
compelling explanations, in the fall of 1993, the author conducted
ethnographic observations in a predominantly African American middle
school in Oakland, California. This particular school was chosen because
it was in the process of implementing the Algebra Project Transition
Curriculum, an experience-based curriculum that was being used in a
number of middle school sites around the country, specifically in middle
schools with large numbers of African-American students. This curriculum
was designed to help African American students “mathematize” their
experiences in real-world contexts using a highly successful five-step
learning process: (a) experiential learning, (b) mathematical
communication, (c) cooperative learning, (d) emphasis on multiple
representations, and (e) problem solving. Chapter 1, entitled
“Mathematics Learning, Achievement, and Persistence among
African-Americans: Toward a Context-Based Perspective,” frames the
basis of the book by reviewing and critiquing existing perspectives of
mathematics achievement and persistence among African-Americans. The
author discusses the ability of Black students and their attitude and
achievement levels, based on results from large-scale tests of
mathematical achievement, such as the National Assessment of Educational
Progress (NAEP). Those results indicate that, as a group, African
American students typically score below their White peers in all content
areas of mathematics. The chapter also presents the capstone of the
author’s research; a multilevel framework that he believes allows one
to trace out the explanatory streams of mathematics achievement and
identifies mechanisms that produce both mathematics success and failure
among African-American students. This multi-level framework addressed
mathematical socialization and identity, cultural and community beliefs
about mathematics, school-level factors that affected mathematical
achievement levels, and student success and the role of intrapersonal
agency. Chapter 2, entitled
“’I Wasn’t Going to be Doing any Math:’ Mathematics
Socialization, Identity, and the Evolution of Community Beliefs about
Mathematics,” offers an analysis of the mathematical experiences of
four African American parents and community members. These four
narratives highlighted a particular collection of socioeconomic and
educational experiences that dramatically affected the participants’
mathematics identities and their expectations and goals for themselves
and for their children. Even in such a small sample, African American
adults had insightful and compelling stories to tell about their
mathematical experiences. All four narratives address beliefs about
African American status and differential treatment, beliefs about the
importance of mathematics, beliefs about motivation to obtain
mathematical knowledge, socioeconomic and educational goals, and
expectations for children. Embedded within each of these stories are
references to the achievement and persistence problems that continue to
affect large numbers of African American students. Chapter 3, entitled
“’When Am I Ever Going to Use This?:’ School-Level factors and
Mathematics Socialization among African-American Students,”
characterizes several important school-level factors that affect the
conditions for mathematics learning and teaching in a predominantly
African-American middle school in Oakland, California. Based on
interviews with several teachers and observations of teachers and
students in their normal in-school setting, the author discovers various
school-level forces that contribute to the students’ in-school
mathematics socializations. These forces include the role of teachers as
agents of mathematical socialization, the role of peers in mathematical
socialization, and the ways in which classroom and curricular practices
served as contexts that promoted positive or negative mathematical
socialization and identity. Based on the results of the qualitative
inquiry, there is a strong norm of underachievement among most of the
students. This norm negatively influences many students’ in-class
behaviors and also contributes to their beliefs about, and resistance
to, many of the reform-oriented practices stressed in the Algebra
Project curriculum. Chapter 3 details the effects of this resistance on
mathematics learning and teaching. Chapter 4, entitled
“’Because I Want to Be Somebody: African-American Student Narratives
on Academic and Mathematics Success,” illustrates the often overlooked
strengths and resiliency of African American students, particularly in
mathematics. The seven narratives on academic and mathematical success
highlighted the factors that influenced these students’ success in
light of the discussions in chapters 2 and 3. The discussions focused on
the ways in which successful students view themselves as learners of
mathematics, the beliefs they hold about the instrumental importance of
mathematics, their motivations to learn mathematics, and the actions
they take to achieve and maintain their success. Each narrative
addressed personal identity, personal goals and motivation to learn,
perceptions of peers and school climate, perceptions of teachers,
beliefs about mathematical ability, beliefs about the importance of
mathematics, and beliefs about differential treatment. The student
narratives strongly suggest that African American students can achieve
success in mathematics. Chapter 5, entitled
“Mathematics Socialization and Identity Among African-Americans: Real
Life Experiences, Research, and Recommendations,” synthesizes analyses
presented in chapters 2, 3, and 4. These analyses indicate that the
messages generated within these contexts can be very powerful and can
profoundly influence one’s mathematical identity. The discussion also
returns to the context-based framework that was introduced in Chapter 1
and highlighted important relationships between the themes outlined in
the framework. The chapter concluded by highlighting the contributions
and implications of the author’s research for mathematical educators,
African American students, and teachers of African American students. The author uses
qualitative inquiry to address the issues confronted in this book,
ethnography in particular. According to Ary, Jacobs, and Razavieh
(2002), ethnography is the “in-depth study of naturally occurring
behavior within a culture or social group” (p. 25). A major strength
of this approach to research is that it seeks to understand human and
social behavior from the “insider’s” perspective, as it is lived
by participants in a particular setting. The advantage of the research
conducted by the author is that it displays that human behavior can be
fully understood only by knowing the setting in which it occurs. The
interviews and observations produced a wealth of information rich data
that cannot be obtained through written surveys or other data collection
methods. The students and teachers’ personal words added face validity
and credibility to the research project. In contrast, a
noted weakness with the data collection method was that it only measures
a small number of people and cases. The implications suggested by the
author can only be directed to the cases in the book. More specifically,
the cases selected were not representative of the entire African
American population. Therefore, the extent to produce valid
generalizations is very limited. Also, another major concern with this
type of inquiry was the credibility of the researcher. Ary et al. (2002)
stated that the main limitation with ethnographic research is that the
findings depend heavily on the particular researcher’s observations
and interpretations of the data. “The researcher has an obligation to
represent the realities of the research participants as accurately as
possible and must provide assurances in the report that this obligation
was met” (p. 452). Another concern has to do with the extent to which
the predispositions or biases of the evaluator may affect data analysis
and interpretations. Bias may result from selective observations,
hearing only what one wants to hear, or allowing personal attitudes,
preferences, and feelings to affect interpretation of data. “Getting
close enough to the situation observed to experience it first-hand means
that researchers can learn from their experiences, thereby generating
personal insights, but that closeness makes their objectivity suspect”
(Patton, 2002, p. 569). In summary,
Martin’s book documents small portions of mathematical socialization,
identity, and success among African Americans. It also addresses several
questions related to how these socializations, identities, and successes
were influenced by sociohistorical, community, school, and intrapersonal
forces. The text surely added to our understanding of how mathematical
success and failure among African-Americans are affected by contextual
forces that extend far beyond the school setting. This book will be
useful and informative to many internal and external constituents with
an interest in education, teachers, mathematics education researchers,
and policy makers to name a few. Because it includes history and
context, the theoretical framework the author refers to numerous
occasions in this text may be used to analyze the educational situations
of other groups for whom history and context play important roles. About the
Author: Mr.
Bruce
B. Douglas is a Ph.D. degree student specializing in organizational
development and change in the School of Education at Colorado State
University. His scholarly research interests include the academic
achievement of African American students, diversity initiatives in
organizations, and career advancement opportunities for minorities in
organizations. Address correspondence to the author at Colorado State
University, School of Education, 221 Education
Building, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA; e-mail bbd@lamar.colostate.edu. References
Ary,
D., Jacobs, L.C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research
in education (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
|
||
|