
| Home | Purpose | Editors | Board of Reviewers | Author Guidelines | Review Process | Issues |
Siddle Walker,
V. ,& Snarey, J. R. (2004). Race-ing moral formation, African
American perspectives on care and justice. Kimberly
Hendry, M.A., LPC Race-ing moral
formation, African American perspectives on care and justice,
an enlightening text, increases one’s understanding of the role of
race in moral formation and the contributions of African American voices
to moral education. Historically,
moral theory and practice espouse only White attitudes, beliefs, and
values. Kohlberg’s theory
of justice and Gilligan’s theory of care were highlighted in the
introduction and interwoven throughout the remainder of the text as two
orientations of moral development in continuous debate among scholars.
However, it was noted that African American scholars find it
unnatural to sharply separate care and justice into two separate
microcosms. For example, in
applying this to education African Americans seek educational
environments espousing both orientations of justice and care.
Five African
American justice and basic care values were outlined in the
introduction: (a) Race is Not Subordinate to Gender, (b) Resistance is
Not Subordinate to Accommodation, (c) Religion is Not Subordinate to
Ethics, (d) Agency is Not Subordinate to Legacy, and (e) Community is
Not Subordinate to the Individual. With
these values in mind, a need for a closer examination of educational
models of moral voices and practices was apparent.
Ultimately, an expansion of the models to embrace African
American contributions and values was most necessary. Chapters one
through three provided the reader with a psychological perspective on
moral formation among African Americans during childhood, adolescence,
and adulthood. In drawing
from the work of scholars in chapter one, “Caring and Colortalk:
Childhood Innocence in White and Black,” Audrey Thompson highlighted
the differences in the childhoods of White and Black children.
She reiterated that Black children cannot be protected from the
ills of racism as it is very often presumed through our colorblind
society. However, White
children often are protected as they are not typically on the receiving
end of racism. Thompson
further noted the importance of acknowledging racial identity, culture,
racism, and racial privilege as factors that shape experience.
The author also implicated the importance of addressing these
issues within educational theories of care.
Historically, educational theories of care have been oblivious to
color, and have perpetuated racial inequalities.
Utilizing
Gilligan’s work (1982) in the latter section of chapter one Thompson
revisited four moral themes that emerged from In a different voice.
The centrality of authentic, trustworthy relationships, the first
theme, acknowledged the forthcoming voices of African American
educators. This provided
students with the opportunity to hear about racial differences and
discussion surrounding color. Conversely,
White educators have had a tendency to minimize opportunities for racial
discussions. The second theme,
the salience of the standpoint from which virtues and vices, illustrated
the importance of African Americans developing ethical and
epistemological positions predicted by their own experiences, ventures,
values, and sense of dignity. Further,
the discussion noted the traditional lack of curriculum surrounding
Black history, Black historical figures, and Black culture in the
educational systems. Theme three, the
adoption of a pragmatic orientation toward survival, acknowledged the
struggle of preparing children for racism and protecting children
against racism. Often times,
Black mothers seek to prepare children for racism through numerous
discussions of racism and its ills.
Finally, the fourth theme, the issue of exploitive and oppressive
social relations, was asserted through a discussion of the imminent need
for Black students to challenge themselves to do twice as well in a
White racist society. Black
educators often urge children to surpass each new endeavor with the hope
of success in society. In chapter two,
“The Play of Voices: Black Adolescents Constituting the Self and
Morality,” In describing
subordinate-subjugated voices, In summation, in
chapter 2 Garrett Duncan reiterated that “Black adolescents, as part
of a larger African American culture, bring diasporan African and ethnic
American ethical voices to bear on their experiences” (p. 21-22).
In hearing these voices and understanding these values, one could
only then genuinely hear their moral voices.
Certainly, one can understand the importance of listening and
fully ingesting the value of our Black youth. Chapter three,
“In a Different Room: Toward an African American Woman’s Ethic of
Care and Justice,” continued to highlight voices, although strongly
focused on the voices of African American woman.
Andrea D. Green, author of chapter two, outlined five central
values to womanism. These
themes espoused the foundation of the values at the core of womanism.
Improvisation, the ability to “act spontaneously” and
“think on one’s feet”, demonstrated the African American woman’s
ability to succeed even in the presence of limited resources.
Unction, uncovered from African American culture, revealed the
power of African American tradition.
In the face of racism and societal distrust, African American
woman persisted forward and made strides through the utilization of this
unearthed power. Suspicion
of Assimilation, resistance to White values and norms, perpetuated an
adherence to one’s own set of values and cultural cues.
Interconnectedness, care for self and others, reflected the
African American community, especially women in the African American
community. Spirituality, the
final central value of womanism, has long been commonplace to the
strength of African American woman.
In providing these central values it was evident to the reader
that as Green suggested that womanist thought encompassed and moderated
care-and-justice ethics. Transitioning into
Chapter four, “Caring in the Past: The Case of a Southern Segregated
African American School,” provided research to support care and
justice themes within segregated schools.
Most often, educators in segregated schools demonstrated strong
ethics of care and justice. Teachers
played a variety of roles to demonstrate these ethics, such as,
counselor, encourager, benefactor, and racial cheerleader.
Teachers, in the segregated schools, were often known to not only
play a role in the child’s life at school but also outside of the
educational environment. Principals
were also known to take on many of the aforementioned roles to ensure a
well-balanced educational environment for all students.
Additionally,
teachers and principals developed extracurricular programs for African
American students to participate in often times supplementing the
financial resources. The
intention was to not only provide Black students with the same
opportunities as White students, but to create an environment of success
for students. Additionally,
educators in segregated schools incorporated assembly and homeroom plans
into the school day of these Black students.
In responding to academic needs, often times principals would
seek a more rigorous curriculum for Black students.
Truly, educators in segregated schools demonstrated care and
concern for the whole student through interpersonal interactions and
institutional caring. In conceptualizing
this, the author presented chapter five, “Justice and Care in
Postdesegregation Urban Schools: Rethinking the Role of Teacher
Education Programs.” It
illustrated the disheartened realities of desegregated schools at the
present time. The research
literature has substantiated that many urban schools are in need of
assistance to foster a more just and caring environment for students to
succeed. Aligned with this
trend, the chapter focused on ways of broadening the fundamentals of
teacher education to incorporate a more specific emphasis on African
American teaching and learning traditions.
Accordingly, a case study is reviewed in which participants of a
teacher education faculty examine personal beliefs about diversity.
In the book, the
faculty was open to discussion and demonstrated care and concern for the
needs and voices of African American students.
In projecting into the future, Chapter 6, “Crime
and Punishment: Moral Dilemmas in the Inner-City Classroom,” posed
many challenges for the reader. It
reinforced the necessary collaboration of justice and care within the
school systems. Educators
were faced with dilemmas of crime and punishment in the urban school
systems on a daily basis. A
case study was reviewed in the chapter to demonstrate conflicting moral
understandings between a student and school officials.
It reiterated the need for schools to create institutional
structures that foster caring environments. In the conclusion,
Siddle Walker and Snarey revisited the “big five” primary dual
values of justice and basic care, race-gender, resistance-accommodation,
religion-ethics, agency-legacy, and community-individual, and discuss
the virtues that potentially arise from each dual-natured set of values.
Finally, moral exemplars were highlighted to substantiate the
mature balancing of values and embodiment of its resulting virtue. The text was
enlightening as it encouraged the movement away from a color-neutral
society. It encouraged the
reader to embrace color and bring forth discussion in educational
environments. Accordingly,
educators could then potentially through this discussion and
understanding respond to the needs of Black and White students alike.
Further, the text highlighted and expanded upon African American
central values to moral formation. This
book substantiated the need for all educators to understand the
necessity of incorporating these values into the existing White
dominated educational practices. Research
substantiated the successful balance of ethics of care and justice in
segregated schools. This
again encouraged us to re-examine our current ethical practices in
schools. In my opinion, this
eye-opening text is essential for educators, policy-makers, and
practitioners, alike, as imminent changes in the school systems must be
made to successfully meet the needs of all students. About the Author: Ms. Kimberly Hendry is a doctoral student in counselor education, with a school counseling focus, at The Ohio State University. Her research interests include school counseling services provided for students in urban school districts, allocation of educational funding and resources, and student opportunities for career assessment and exploration in preparation for postsecondary options. Ms. Hendry can be reached via e-mail at hendry.3@osu.edu.
|
||
|